|
The Deadly Consequences of Illegal Alien Smuggling
Testimony prepared for the U.S. House of Representatives
Committee on the Judiciary
Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims
June 24, 2003
Statement of Peter Nunez
Chairman of the Board, Center for Immigration Studies
Link on Judiciary
website
Thank you for inviting me to testify concerning “The Deadly Consequences of
Illegal Alien Smuggling.” The tragic deaths involving the truck in Victoria,
Texas, last month once again demonstrate the deadly consequences arising from
the complete failure of our current immigration policy to deal with the chaos
along our borders resulting from illegal immigration.
My perspective on this issue is based on my experience over the past thirty
years, first as a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorneys Office in San Diego,
California, from 1972 to 1988, then as the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
at the Treasury Department from 1990 to 1993, and as a person who has lived on
the border for most of the past 40 years. I currently serve as a lecturer in the
Political Science Department at the University of San Diego, where I teach
courses in Transnational Crime and Terrorism, American Criminal Justice, and the
Politics of Immigration Policy. Finally, I have been affiliated with a number of
immigration reform organizations, and currently serve as the chairman of the
board of directors for the Center for Immigration Studies here in Washington,
D.C.
Unfortunately, deaths along the border related to illegal alien smuggling are
not a new phenomenon. It was not at all unusual for people to die trying to
enter this country along our southern border during the sixteen years I served
as a federal prosecutor in San Diego. Deaths due to exposure to the elements, to
traffic accidents, and to the inhumane treatment received from smugglers were
all too common even during the ‘70’s and ‘80’s. It has always been a matter of
the highest priority for both the Border Patrol and the U.S. Attorneys offices
along the border to investigate and prosecute cases where a death was involved.
And I am aware of the extraordinary efforts that have been made over the past
ten years - since the inception of Operation Gatekeeper in San Diego and Hold
the Line in El Paso - by agencies of both the United States and Mexican
governments, to warn would-be illegal aliens of the potential dangers they faced
in trying to cross the border illegally through the deserts and mountains.
Notwithstanding these efforts, deaths have continued to occur, and will continue
as long as we fail to control our borders and as long as we cling to an
outdated, failed, and disastrous immigration policy. Because if we try to find
the cause of these deaths, and if we are trying to prevent them, then we need
look no further then to the unwillingness of the United States to reform its
immigration laws in light of the realities of the 21st Century.
Clearly criminal responsibility for these deaths can be laid at the feet of the
smugglers who left these poor people to die in the back of a truck. It can also
be argued that the illegal aliens themselves are partly responsible for their
own deaths, given their willingness to risk harm by entering this country
illegally, in violation of our criminal laws. But the illegal aliens who attempt
to enter this country by putting their lives at risk, and the smugglers who feed
off the desperation of these people, are all reacting to a set of circumstances
that act as both “push” and “pull” factors in stimulating the flow of immigrants
from Mexico and the Third World to the United States. The plain fact is that the
huge disparity in economic conditions between Mexico and the United States, as
well as the abundant social services available to immigrants once they arrive
here, will compel people to attempt the journey even in the face of danger and
hardship.
So until Mexico is willing and able to deal with the “push” factors that force
millions of its citizens to seek a better life in the United Sates, and until
the United States is willing to deal with the “pull” factors that lure millions
of poor people here from around the world, we should expect that deaths among
immigrants will continue to occur. These deaths are not “caused” by law
enforcement or by efforts such as Gatekeeper and Hold the Line; the Border
Patrol and the INS have been the scapegoats, told to enforce the law, but not
given the resources needed to do the job correctly. What we need to do, at least
along the border, is to expand Gatekeeper and Hold the Line to those trouble
spots that now represent the biggest threats of illegal entry. Just as the
Border Patrol was doubled in size during the early and mid-“90’s to provide the
resources needed in San Diego and El Paso, now we must add however many more
Border Patrol agents are needed to close the remaining gaps.
But “border control” alone will never be enough. What is needed is a
comprehensive reform of our immigration policy designed to eliminate all of the
perverse incentives that continue to draw illegal aliens to this country. If it
is true that most immigrants - both legal and illegal - come to this country to
work, then it is essential to finally enact an employer sanctions provision that
works. Equally important, however, is the need to reestablish an effective
interior enforcement mechanism designed to locate, arrest, and deport the 8
million-plus illegal aliens now living in the United States. For nothing works
as a better incentive for illegal aliens than the fact that they know that no
one will bother them if they are able to reach the interior of the United
States.
Beginning in the late 1980’s, INS began retreating from their historical and
statutory mandate to locate, arrest, and deport those illegal aliens who managed
to evade the Border Patrol or INS inspectors at our ports of entry, and those
non-immigrants who originally entered legally but who overstayed their visas.
This abdication of the interior enforcement function escalated during the ‘90’s,
and has all but disappeared in the current environment. Only the horrors of 9/11
have resulted in any effective interior enforcement, and that is aimed solely at
potential terrorists.
In fact, while the latest INS figures show a 75% increase in the deportation of
Arabs and Muslims (FY 2002 compared to FY 2001), the same figures show an
OVERALL DECREASE of 16% in the total number of deportations. In FY 2002, 28,833
fewer deportations took place than the preceding year; the biggest decline was
among Mexicans, the single largest national group, which saw a decline of 32,692
illegal alien Mexicans.
So if you were a poor Mexican living in Mexico, you would know that your chances
of being caught crossing the border would be slight, and even if you were
caught, nothing bad would happen to you. There would be no prosecution, and no
other meaningful sanction to dissuade you from attempting to enter illegally.
And you would also know that once you made it past the Border Patrol, you would
essentially be home free, that no one would be looking for you after you arrived
at your destination in the interior of the United States. And you would know
that there would be jobs available for you, even if you might be cheated by your
employer, that there would be some level of free medical care for you and your
family, free public education for your children, and perhaps even some
additional benefits for you and yours, all at the expense of the American
taxpayer.
Some states are also offering additional benefits for illegal aliens. To make it
easier for you to survive once you are here, some states will allow you to get a
genuine government ID card in the form of a drivers license, which you can then
use to obtain other indicia of legality that will allow you to burrow deeper
into the fabric of America.
And to make sure that you aren’t bothered, various state and local governments
have adopted policies that prevent state and local police from participating in
the effort to locate, arrest, and deport these criminals, or of even cooperating
with INS and the Border Patrol.
And in order to help American banks to make a profit, the Treasury Department
has authorized financial institutions to accept as valid proof of identity
documents such as the matricula consular, which will enable illegal aliens to
open bank accounts so they can more conveniently send home to Mexico their share
of the roughly $10 Billion in remittances that flows south every year, which,
indeed, explains the zeal with which the Mexican government endorses and
encourages its citizens to break our laws by sneaking across the border
illegally.
And what to make of the various other agencies of the federal government that
act in ways to make enforcement of our immigration laws more difficult, that act
in ways designed to subvert the responsibilities of those assigned the task of
enforcing our immigration laws. We already know about the disconnects that
exist(ed?) between the State Department, the FBI, the CIA, and INS prior to 9/11
that prevented INS from even attempting to do its job properly. But what about
the more mundane business of the federal government, where the Social Security
Administration does nothing about the bogus-on-its-face information it receives
from employers demonstrating phony social security account numbers, the failure
of IRS and the Labor Department to lift a finger to share information with INS
that could be used to identify illegal aliens and lead to their arrest and
removal. How many federal governments do we have? Why are not all agencies of
the government cooperating to assist INS in performing its duty, all of which
makes it infinitely easier for illegal aliens to avoid detection and remain here
for decades?
And we need to stop the talk of a coming amnesty, or of a guest worker program,
both of which, by themselves, serve to encourage additional illegal immigration.
What kind of message are we sending when we dangle that possibility before
people desperate enough to put their lives at risk? Doesn’t this kind of talk
also indicate that we really don’t care much about law breaking, that we don’t
really care that much about the rule of law that these immigration laws exist
only as a token objection to the violation of our sovereignty?
And finally, if you are able to avoid detection long enough, your children will
be allowed to enter a state college or university and pay in-state tuition,
unlike other law-abiding American citizens from out of state who must pay a
significantly higher amount.
Soon after 9/11, Attorney General Ashcroft quite appropriately suggested that he
wanted the state and local law enforcement communities to assist the federal
government in locating suspected terrorists, all of whom, almost by definition,
are here as immigrants or non-immigrant guests. Somehow, then, we expect state
and local law enforcement to be able to distinguish between illegal aliens who
might be terrorists and illegal aliens who are only criminals because they broke
some other American law. At about the same time, the federal law enforcement
agencies began to round up illegal aliens who were from the Middle East or who
were Arabs, but not those from anywhere else in the world. Law enforcement also
began to locate, arrest, and deport illegal aliens if they worked at airports or
other high security locations, but not of they worked in some other sector of
the economy. We also became concerned about those illegal aliens that worked at
our military bases, such as the U.S. Navy Submarine Base in San Diego, but not
those working outside the base. We even arrested and deported those illegal
aliens who had the misfortune of working as limo drivers for the NFL Super Bowl
held in San Diego this past January. But all other illegal aliens - most of the
8 million-plus who are here - have nothing to fear, because no one cares that
they are here, and no one is doing anything about it. If that is not an
incentive for illegal immigration, nothing is.
One last point about deaths relating to illegal immigration. We should be as
concerned about the deaths (and other violent crimes) caused BY illegal aliens
as we are about the deaths of illegal aliens that occur during the course of
their own volitional acts of illegally entering this country.
On June 13 of this year, Oceanside Police Department officer Tony Zeppetella,
age 27, was gunned down and executed by one Adrian Camacho, described as “an
Oceanside gang member with a history of violence and drugs.” (San Diego
Union-Tribune, June 20,2003) What the news article does not report is that the
defendant has been convicted on numerous felonies, and has previously been
deported as an illegal alien! Too bad the Oceanside Police Department and the
San Diego County Sheriff’s Office were not interested in illegal aliens. Too bad
that the INS in San Diego does not have an effective program designed to locate,
arrest, and deport illegal aliens. Maybe if they did, Officer Zeppetella’s widow
and six-month old child would not be suffering today over their loss.
Or take the recent case from Northern California involving the kidnapping (and
who knows what else) of a 9-year-old girl, who, thankfully, survived her ordeal.
Her kidnapper? Another illegal alien, who was able to hide in plain sight, due
in part to the policy of the San Jose Police Department to look the other way
with regard to immigration violators. And of course the INS has no program to
fulfill its statutory duty to locate, arrest, and deport illegal aliens.
So as we mourn the deaths of those who voluntarily decided to break our criminal
law by entering this country illegally, let’s also save a little compassion for
those who become the victims of illegal aliens, with the full complicity of the
federal government and state and local law enforcement agencies that have
decided to look the other way.
The bottom line is that this Congress has to end the chaos of our past and
present immigration policy, and put in place serious reform efforts that will
enhance the ability of the new INS to do its job. We must, as a country, stop
sending a mixed message to the downtrodden of the world that we will leave you
alone if you have the courage and the ingenuity to make it past our borders. The
federal government must use all of its resources to attack this problem
comprehensively. The state and local governments must be brought into the
effort, and any and all incentives dangled by state and local governments must
be ended. Only by turning off the magnets that provoke this lawlessness can we
ever stop the chaos at the borders that results, unfortunately, in the loss of
life. |