Morning News, 8/22/11

1. Obama woos Hispanics
2. Perry talks in SC
3. Sheriffs seek donations
4. Activists cheer amnesty
5. Bishop targets AL



1.
Obama administration works to rekindle excitement among Hispanic voters
By Peter Wallsten
The Washington Post, August 21, 2011

While most of Washington was embroiled in the debt-ceiling drama last month, about 160 Hispanic leaders from across the country filed into the White House one day, largely unnoticed.

For two days, they enjoyed full access to top presidential advisers, Cabinet members and administration officials from across the government. Before the participants left town, they received a glossy 33-page booklet detailing talking points to be shared back home — 1.9 million Hispanics kept out of poverty by the stimulus, $808 million in loans last year to Hispanic small businesses, and an extra $1 billion directed to colleges with large numbers of Hispanic students, to name a few.

The event was part of broader efforts by the White House and Obama’s reelection campaign to rekindle excitement among Hispanic voters, many of whom have turned their backs on the president amid disappointment over his immigration policies. Key to the strategy is shifting voters’ attention beyond the caustic immigration debate with data-driven appeals that show progress in other areas, while arguing that Obama is better on immigration than any of his potential Republican foes.

The tensions — and the administration’s aggressive efforts to soothe them — reached a climax of sorts in a flurry of activity last week, with the administration making a surprise announcement Thursday that it was giving officials discretion to suspend certain deportation cases that have drawn fire from critics, such as ones involving young people brought to the country in early childhood.

The White House move came two days after immigrant advocates delivered tens of thousands of petitions to Obama’s reelection headquarters and other Democratic Party offices demanding an end to the administration’s aggressive deportation policy.

Adding to Democrats’ anxiety are signs that Republicans are trying to take advantage of the strain between Obama and Hispanics.

Crossroads GPS, the pro-GOP group advised by Karl Rove, saturated Spanish-language airwaves in key states last month with ads blasting Obama’s record. And one of the party’s presidential front-runners, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, brings a history of courting Hispanic voters. He even backed a law granting in-state college tuition for many children of illegal immigrants.

The White House outreach strategy underscores the quandary facing Obama and his aides, who are struggling to keep their hold on a voter bloc that was a key piece of the president’s 2008 coalition of minorities, young people and white liberals and is expected to play an even greater role in deciding his reelection.

Administration officials announced last week that they would host Hispanic policy conferences in cities across the country. Some will be in key political battlegrounds — with the first to take place this month in Orlando, home to a large Puerto Rican community that is a prime target for the campaign’s early voter registration efforts.

“I understand the pain that our community is going through,” said Labor Secretary Hilda L. Solis, who is hosting policy roundtables with Hispanic activists across the country as a top White House liaison to the community. But, she added, “I think it’s amazing how little people know of the good things that this administration has done.”

At her roundtables, Solis distributes handouts describing measures her agency has taken to help Hispanics. At a meeting in Las Vegas this month, she gave out literature about policies designed to improve safety conditions for Hispanic workers. She said other announcements geared toward helping Hispanics would come soon, although she declined to offer specifics.

Obama won two-thirds of the Hispanic vote in 2008 after pledging that overhauling immigration policies would be a top priority in his first term. While immigration does not always rank as the No. 1 issue for Hispanics, activists say Obama’s failure to pass legislation granting a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, combined with a deportation program that has removed more than 1 million illegal immigrants since 2009, has stirred deep disappointment.

A majority of the Hispanic voters surveyed by the nonpartisan polling group Latino Decisions said they know an illegal immigrant, and one-fourth said they know someone who is facing deportation or has been deported.

Obama’s job approval rating among Hispanics has plummeted since its high mark in April 2009, according to Gallup, from 85 percent to 49 percent this month.
. . .
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-administration-works-to-rek...

********
********

2.
Rick Perry moves right on immigration
By Robin Abcarian and Maeve Reston
Los Angeles Times, August 20, 2011

Immigration advocates in Texas were heartened last year when the Republican governor, Rick Perry, flatly stated that Arizona's crackdown on illegal immigrants "would not be the right direction for Texas."

But in June, Perry convened a special session of the Legislature, hoping to pass a measure outlawing sanctuary cities — places where police are not allowed to ask people they detain about immigration status.

The law, which had already failed during the Legislature's regular session, was defeated a second time thanks to an opposition coalition that included immigration activists as well as law enforcement officials, evangelical pastors and Republican business owners, among them one of Perry's biggest fundraisers.

Why did the governor push the ban in a state where no official sanctuary cities even exist? Many in Texas, including Perry supporters, thought they knew the answer: He was considering a run for the Republican presidential nomination.

"I suspect it came from his advisors," said Houston insurance broker Norman Adams, a Republican and Perry supporter who fought hard against the bill, which he considered anti-business. "You know, 'You need to look tough on immigration, so we want a sanctuary bill.' "

As governor of the state with the longest common border with Mexico — 1,254 miles — Perry entered the presidential race in a unique position among the top tier of Republican presidential aspirants.

His state is home to nearly a fifth of the U.S. Latino population, and in his most recent reelection, he received 38% of the Latino vote. Like other ambitious Republicans in Western states with large Latino electorates, he has held more moderate or nuanced positions on illegal immigration than others in his party.

In 2001, Perry supported a Texas version of the DREAM Act, which allows undocumented students to pay in-state tuition at public colleges and has drawn strong opposition from many conservatives. Perry also has pressed for a guest-worker program and has said he supports a border fence, but only in high-population areas.

"There's a lot of gray with Perry," said Republican restaurateur Louis Barrios of San Antonio, who has raised money for Perry and believes the governor's views were informed by his hardscrabble West Texas upbringing. "He's a farmer. A poor farmer. He knows what immigrant labor has done for this country."

But his more recent moves have leaned to the right. In May, Perry signed a stringent voter ID law that required citizens to show one of five acceptable ID photographs before they may vote. (Opponents argued that the requirement would disenfranchise the poor and minorities who lack passports or driver's licenses.)

Perry's previous moderate stances have already caused him problems among Republican voters, particularly those who oppose compromise on illegal immigration.

But his more recent conservative positions carry a risk as well, imperiling his standing among Latinos, an important voting bloc in national battleground states such as New Mexico, Colorado and Nevada. In June, Perry got a chilly response when he spoke at a conference of the National Assn. of Latino Elected Officials in San Antonio. Outside the conference, a coalition of Latino and civil rights groups staged a protest against him.
. . .
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/20/nation/la-na-0821-perry-immigrat...

********
********

3.
Border Sheriffs Seek Donations to Unblock Arizona Immigration Law
Fox News Latino, August 22, 2011

A group of sheriffs representing an Arizona border county is seeking $60,000 in donations to file a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the state's controversial immigration law.

The Border Sheriffs group, which represents Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever, wrote in fundraising letters that it has raised $29,000 but needs $31,000 more for the brief or key parts of SB1070 will remain blocked by the courts.

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer's office is trying to persuade the U.S. Supreme Court to take the case and overturn an April decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Brewer had asked the appeals court to lift an injunction imposed by a federal judge the day before the law was to take effect on July 29, 2010. The U.S Justice Department sued to block the law, saying it violates the Constitution because enforcing Immigration law is a federal issue.

The Arizona Daily Star reported that Dever wants to submit a "friend of the court" brief saying why the high court should take the case from his on-the-border view.

The brief is a filing by an outside party about a case under consideration, and it may include information not in previous appeals. Such briefs can have an impact, said Nick Dranias, an attorney who heads the Goldwater Institute's Center for Constitutional Government and has filed many such briefs.

"I think of the amicus brief as the op-ed of legal briefings," Dranias said.

Dever said he wants to tell the court how the Arizona law, known as SB1070, can help his border county.

"We're trying to drive home the importance and significance of this law relieving pressure on the border here by eliminating sanctuary policies in this state," Dever said.
. . .
http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2011/08/22/donations-sought-to...

Related Topic: Arizona

********
********

4.
Advocates cheer new immigration rules, but expect Obama to follow through
By Mike Lillis
The Hill (DC), August 21, 2011

President Obama's move to halt deportations for thousands of illegal immigrants will resonate with Latino voters only to the extent that he backs it up, immigration reform advocates warned this week.

The advocates have been disappointed in Obama for not fighting harder for the immigration reforms he'd promised on the campaign trail — dismay the president eased this week by announcing new rules allowing non-violent illegal immigrants to remain in the country indefinitely.

Yet talk is one thing, and action another, say the advocates, who are hoping the rollout of the policy matches the rhetoric. The reception from many Hispanic voters, some warn, will hinge on that being the case.

"There has been a lot of skepticism in the Latino community about the President's willingness to fight on the immigration issue," Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) said Friday in an email. "So my sense is people will wait to see how the new Homeland Security procedures are implemented and how hard the President fights back against the inevitable backlash from Fox [News] and the Republicans."

Clarissa Martinez, director of immigration at the National Council of La Raza, echoed that sentiment.

"As an initial move, it's very significant. It gives him a stronger platform to say he's doing what he said he'd do," she said Friday. "But implementation will be crucial."

Sen. Dick Durbin, a close Obama ally and one of the loudest immigration reform proponents on Capitol Hill, sounded a similar note this week. The Illinois Democrat said the new policy represents "a fair and just way to deal with an important group of immigrant students." But Durbin was quick to add that he'll "closely monitor DHS [the Department of Homeland Security] to ensure it is fully implemented."

Unveiled Thursday, the new rules will eliminate blanket exile for those in the process of being deported. Instead, DHS officials will perform case-by-case reviews, prioritizing violent criminals and other public menaces, while closing the books on students and others not considered a threat.

Many Democrats have hailed the change as a common-sense prioritization of limited resources. But Republicans are hammering it as an end-around Congress, which defeated a similar proposal — the DREAM Act — in December.

Homeland Security Chairman Peter King (R-N.Y.) and Rep. Candice Miller (R-Mich.), chairwoman of the subpanel on border security, said the change is "a blatant attempt to grant amnesty to potentially millions of illegal aliens in this country."

"In reality, this decision to vastly expand the exercise of ‘prosecutorial discretion’ in enforcing our federal immigration laws means that the administration will now be, in a huge number of cases, simply ignoring those laws," the Republicans said Friday in a joint statement.
. . .
Rep. Xavier Becerra (Calif.), vice chairman of the Democratic Caucus, said Friday that the new rules are a welcome change of direction.

"This is more than a good step," he said in a statement. "It is a giant leap toward sanity and the ultimate goal of fixing our broken immigration system once and for all."

Others aren't so sure.

Steven Camarota, research director at the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), which supports tougher immigration enforcement, said that, from a policy standpoint, the new policy ignores existing law and "demoralizes" the enforcement officers charged with rounding up undocumented people.

Additionally, Camarota said, the change could backfire on Obama politically by undermining the public's already shaky confidence in the government's ability — or appetite — to enforce the nation's immigration laws.

"He's vulnerable on this," he said.
. . .
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/177641-advocates-cheer-new-im...

Related Topic: Administrative Amnesty

********
********

5.
Religious leaders battle Alabama immigration law
By Kent Faulk
National Catholic Reporters, August 22, 2011

Alabama religious leaders have filed statements in federal court expressing their concern that a new immigration law would interfere with the practice of their religion and Christian mandates to minister to all people.

Bishops in the Episcopal, United Methodist and Roman Catholic churches and 17 other church ministry leaders on Wednesday (Aug. 17) filed affidavits in the federal court lawsuits that seek to block enforcement of the new law.

Their lawsuit was consolidated with those filed by the U.S. Justice Department and Hispanic advocacy groups that also sought to void the new state law.

Most of the provisions of Alabama’s new immigration law go into effect Sept. 1.

The bishops in their affidavits described their churches’ ministries, including those designed to help feed, clothe and shelter the poor.

“In providing or supporting these ministries, we do not—and would not—refuse to assist any person in need because he or she lacked legal immigration status,” said Episcopal Bishop of Alabama Henry Parsley.

The new immigration law would make providing those ministries and services a crime, the bishops and others who filed affidavits wrote.
. . .
http://ncronline.org/news/immigration-and-church/religious-leaders-battl...

Related Topic: Alabama