Please visit our YouTube and Facebook pages.

1. DHS brokers new 287(g) MOAs
2. Sen takes interest in AZ co
3. Maine AG clears cops
4. Clergy invoke God for amnesty
5. Activists blast costume

1.
U.S. Alters Disputed Immigration Rules for Police
By Randal C. Archibold
The New York Times, October 17, 2009

Phoenix -- Addressing one of the most contentious immigration policies in recent years, the Obama administration unveiled changes Friday in a program that allows state and local police officers enforce federal immigration law.

As promised in July, the Department of Homeland Security said it had revamped the program to focus on rooting out illegal immigrants who have committed serious crimes. The changes also require law enforcement officers enrolled in the program to abide by federal anti-discrimination law. In addition, federal officials pledged to supervise the program more closely, flag problems and field complaints from the public.

Civil libertarians and immigration advocacy groups had complained that participating police agencies had unduly made targets of immigrants who commit relatively minor offenses, like traffic violators. There have also been widespread accusations that police officers have engaged in racial profiling. Much of the criticism has been focused here in metropolitan Phoenix, where the Maricopa County sheriff has made a national name for himself with his immigration crackdown.

Some critics, including most recently several Latino members of Congress, had urged the Obama administration to drop the program because of the problems, and those opponents were little mollified by the revisions announced Friday.

But Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials, suggesting that the changes would address the troubles, said they intended to expand the program, known as 287(g) for the section of the 1996 law that authorized it.

Officials said ICE had renewed agreements with 55 state and local law enforcement agencies. An additional 12, officials said, have reached tentative agreements that, if confirmed by their local governing bodies, will increase participation in the program to 67 agencies, from the current 66. ICE also remains in negotiations with six other agencies, including one of the largest, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

Six previously participating agencies, however, have withdrawn, including the Houston Police Department. Houston officials said they were wary of police officers’ acting as immigration agents and planned to enroll soon in a separate federal program that would allow all jail inmates, not just those suspected of being in the country illegally, to be screened for federal offenses, including immigration violations.

Nowhere has the 287(g) program been more controversial than in Maricopa County, where Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whose department has the largest number of personnel trained in the program, faces a Justice Department investigation over complaints of civil rights violations. Lawsuits accuse deputies of singling out Latinos for stops that include a check of their immigration status.

ICE announced Friday that it had withdrawn its authorization for the sheriff’s street enforcement of immigration law, in which 100 federally trained deputies had been engaged. But, to the ire of immigrant advocates, the federal agency will continue to allow 60 deputies to screen jail inmates, who have accounted for a vast majority of the immigration arrests.

Mr. Arpaio has denounced federal officials for the changes and conducted a crime sweep Friday in Surprise, a Phoenix suburb, as a retort, saying he could pursue illegal immigrants under state laws that bar activity like human smuggling.

“The sheriff is prone to rhetoric on occasion, and some of that is about ICE,” said John T. Morton, the agency’s director. “But I call things on the merits.”

The new agreements are the latest evolution of the program, which got under way in 1996 but did not begin to grow in earnest until after the Sept. 11 attacks. The immigration agency is requesting $68.1 million to run the program in the fiscal year that began Oct. 1.

More than 133,000 illegal immigrants have been arrested through the program since January 2006, though ICE officials said they could not readily provide information on how many had been deported.

While opponents denounce the program as ineffective and prone to abuse, its defenders say there is no reason why illegal immigrants who have committed a crime, even if not of the most serious nature, should be allowed to remain in the United States.

“Claims that the program was supposed to focus only on serious crimes are false,” said a joint statement by Representatives Trent Franks, a Republican whose district includes Maricopa County, and Lamar Smith, a Texas Republican who was an author of the 287(g) legislation. “In fact, the program was created to let state and local law enforcement officials help enforce all immigration laws, not a select few.”

The debate continued to boil here on Friday, when protesters marched on Mr. Arpaio’s downtown office, as they regularly do, around the time his crime sweep got under way 20 miles away in Surprise.

Later, at an outdoor news conference in Surprise, Mr. Arpaio said eight people suspected of being illegal immigrants had been arrested under a state statute that forbids human smuggling.

“We will continue to do what we have been doing,” he said, fighting to speak over the din of shouting protesters.
. . .
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/17/us/17immig.html

********
********

2.
Does McCain back ban on Arpaio immigration sweeps?
By Glenn Thrush
The Politico (Washington, DC), October 18, 2009

Sen. John McCain -- a fervent sponsor of immigration reform -- is once again being dragged into the messy border war of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who is defying the Obama administration's ban on his highly controversial illegal immigrant sweeps in the Phoenix area.

Last week, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano excluded Arpaio -- reviled by Hispanic advocacy groups for alleged racial profiling-- from a joint federal program that gives local law enforcement agencies the power to dragnet for illegals.

McCain's office wouldn't say whether he supported or opposed the move. But late Friday, McCain wrote Napolitano asking for an explanation, asking for her to "please provide the rationale for terminating the Task Force Model in Maricopa County and the criteria that made the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office ineligible to continue in the Task Force Model."

A McCain spokeswoman didn't immediately respond to questions about his motivation for sending the missive.

Maricopa is the only county to have its immigrant enforcement powers revoked. Arpaio was characteristically defiant, telling new soulmate Glenn Beck that he's not answerable to DHS, but existing statute: “I’m still going to enforce the state laws and I’m going to enforce the federal laws.

A call to a DHS spokesman on Sunday wasn't immediately returned.
. . .
http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1009/Does_McCain_back_ban_on_A...

********
********

3.
Maine AG: Police shooting of immigrant justified
The Associated Press, October 17, 2009

Augusta, ME (AP) -- Maine's top prosecutor has ruled that two Portland police officers were legally justified when they fatally shot a 26-year-old Sudanese immigrant.

Attorney General Janet Mills said Friday that Benjamin Roper and Joshua Wiseman acted in self-defense when David Okot (OH'-kut) pulled a handgun from the waistband of his pants on the night of April 25.

Police were responding to a report of a drunk man showing off a weapon. Mills says Okot refused to obey the officers' orders and was shot after he pointed a .22-caliber pistol at Wiseman.
. . .
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h4AN9-8TUF3frhw_GC88GH...

********
********

4.
Clergy's role grows in migrant discussion
By Erin Kelly
The Arizona Republic (Phoenix), October 19, 2009

Washington, DC -- As more than 2,500 immigrants rallied at the Capitol in support of comprehensive immigration reform, Methodist Bishop Minerva Carcaño of Arizona told the crowd it could count on her and other religious leaders for support.

"We truly are with you," she said last week as she introduced about a half-dozen Catholic and Protestant clergy members. "And we believe that God is on your side too."

But just which side God is on has increasingly become the subject of debate as pro-immigration and anti-immigration forces bring dueling religious leaders to the nation's capital to argue over whose cause is the most righteous.

Both sides are claiming the moral high ground in anticipation of possible congressional legislation on immigration. Although the issue has been put on hold while lawmakers tackle health care and economic recovery, congressional leaders remain hopeful that they can take up the immigration issue early next year. Reform proponents want legislation to include a path toward citizenship for the nation's 11 million-plus undocumented immigrants along with tighter security at U.S. borders.

So far, immigration supporters have done a better job of attracting Christian and Jewish clergy, immigration opponents acknowledge.

The priests, rabbis and ministers who have dominated the public debate on immigration have come out "almost always on the side of legalization of illegal immigrants and increases in immigration," said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates reduced immigration.
. . .
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/2009/10/19/200910...

********
********

5.
“Illegal Alien” Halloween Costume Draws Criticism
The WSAV News (Savannah, GA), October 19, 2009

A Halloween costume is drawing criticism from a California immigrant rights group.

The costume is being called the illegal alien and features an alien mask, prison suit and oversized green card.

The costume is designed by a Wisconsin company called buy-seasons.

Many stores are not selling the costume, but it is available at many online retailers.
. . .
http://www2.wsav.com/sav/news/weird/article/illegal_alien_halloween_cost...